Books & Arts
83. Dead end, Communism
Jul 2nd 2009 From The Economist print edition
Mankind's biggest mistake
83-1-401
WHY did communism take root? Given its sorrowful harvest, why did it keep spreading? And what ever enabled it to last so long? Archie Brown's new history of communism identifies three big questions, perhaps even the biggest, of the past century.
At first sight, all seem puzzling. Communism was an impractical mishmash of ideas, imposed by squabbling zealots that promised much, delivered little and cost millions of lives. It is striking that 36 countries at one time or another adopted this system and that fiveCuba, Laos, North Korea, Vietnam and the biggest of them all, Chinastill pay lip service to it.
Communism's first big advantage was that it played on two human appetitesthe noble desire for justice and the baser hunger for vengeance. Mr Brown, emeritus professor of politics at Oxford University, traces communism's idealistic roots in the struggle against feudal oppression and beastly working conditions. The moral weight of Karl Marx's criticisms of 19th-century capitalism even won him praise from the high priest of Western liberalism, Karl Popper, a Viennese-born philosopher who emigrated to London. But the intoxicating excitement of revolutionary shortcuts attracted the ruthless and dogmatic, who saw the chance to put into practice Marx's muddled Utopian notionsand settle some scores on the way. "The more representatives of the reactionary clergy and reactionary bourgeoisie we succeed in killing, the better," wrote Lenin in 1922. Even so, many still resist the idea that the founding fathers of communism were murderous maniacs. Revolutions against corrupt and ossified regimes in countries such as Russia and China stoked a steamy enthusiasm that took decades to dissipate.
A. ¾îÈÖ
dead end ¸·´Ù¸¥ °÷, ¸·´Ù¸¥ °ñ¸ñ, ±ÃÁö. harvest °á°ú, ¼öÈ®·®, â¥ü®(¼öÈ®).
identify È®ÀÎÇÏ´Ù. puzzling È¥¶õ½ÃŰ´Â, ÍÝûã(°ïȤ)ÄÉ ÇÏ´Â.
mishmash µÚ¹ü¹÷, À⵿»ç´Ï, È¥¶õ»óÅÂ. impose °¿äÇÏ´Ù, ¶°¸Ã±â´Ù.
squabble ´ÙÅõ´Ù, ÀÔ¾¾¸§ÇÏ´Ù. zealot ¿±¤ÀÚ, ±¤½ÅÀÚ. deliver »êÃâÇÏ´Ù, ¹è´ÞÇÏ´Ù.
adopt óõ÷É(äÅÃ)ÇÏ´Ù. pay lip service to ...ÀÌ°Ô ÀÔ¿¡ ¹ß¸° ¸»À» ÇÏ´Ù.
play on ÀÚ±ØÇÏ´Ù, ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Ù, ÇãÁ¡À» ³ë¸®´Ù. appetite ¿å¸Á, ¿å±¸, ½Ä¿å.
base ºñ¿ÇÑ, õ¹ÚÇÑ, î¸æë(Àú¿)ÇÑ, À̱âÀûÀÎ. hunger ¿¸Á, °¥¸Á, ±¾ÁÖ¸².
vengeance Ý¥âÂ(º¹¼ö), ¾Ó°±À½. emeritus professor ¸í¿¹±³¼ö.
trace °Å½½·¯ ¿Ã¶ó Á¶»çÇÏ´Ù, õÚîæ(ÃßÀû)ÇÏ´Ù. idealistic roots À̳äÀû »Ñ¸®.
feudal ºÀ°ÇÀûÀÎ, ºÀ°Ç½Ã´ëÀÇ. beastly ¿¾ÇÇÑ, ºñõÇÑ, ÀÜÀÎÇÑ, ¾ß¸¸ÀûÀÎ.
priest çßóÆíº(¿¹ÂùÀÚ), ¿ËÈ£ÀÚ, ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ.
emigrate (Ÿ±¹¿¡) ÀÌÁÖÇÏ´Ù, À̹Π°¡´Ù. intoxicating Ô¶ö(µµÃë)½ÃŰ´Â.
revolutionary Çõ¸íÀÇ. shortcut ìµßÌúÁ(ÀÌ»óÇâ)¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÏ´Â Áö¸§±æ.
the ruthless and dogmatic ¹«ÀÚºñÇϰí ÎçðÉîÜ(±³Á¶Àû)ÀÎ »ç¶÷µé.
muddle µÚ¼¯´Ù, È¥¶õ½ÃŰ´Ù, ¸ÁÃÄ ³õ´Ù, ¸ù·ÕÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Ù. notion °³³ä, κҷ(°ü³ä).
representatives ´ëÇ¥ÀÚ, ±¹È¸ÀÇ¿ø. reactionary ¹Ýµ¿ÀûÀÎ. clergy ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚµé.
founding fathers â¾÷ÀÚµé. murderous »ìÀÎÀÇ, ÀÜÀÎÇÑ, Èä¾ÇÇÑ maniacs ¹ÌÄ¡±¤ÀÌ.
corrupt ºÎÆÐÇÑ. ossified Íéûù(°ñÈ)µÈ, Ìãûù(°æÈ)µÈ. regime Á¤±Ç.
stoke ºÒÀ» ¶§´Ù. dissipate ±¸¸§-¾È°³¸¦ Èð¾îÁö°Ô ÇÏ´Ù, °¡½Ã°Ô ÇÏ´Ù.
83-2-402
The communist block also had two bits of good fortune. The economic slump of the 1930s discredited democracy and capitalism. Then came Hitler's disastrous attack on the Soviet Union. The victory over fascism in Europe gave the Soviet Union, an ally of America and Britain, renewed moral weight. Given what had happened in Russia under Stalin in the 1930s, that hardly seemed deserved. As Mr Brown notes, Stalin trusted the Nazi leader more than he trusted his own generals. The Soviet Union killed more top German communists than Hitler's regime did. Yet in some countries, Czechoslovakia for example, Soviet forces were initially welcomed as liberators, and Stalinist regimes took power with a degree of popular consent. In other countries, such as Poland and the Baltic states, it looked different: one occupation gave way to another.
The promised communist nirvana brought a mixture of mass murder, lies and latterly the grey reality of self-interested rule by authoritarian bureaucrats. But it was a bit late for second thoughts. Communist regimes proved remarkably durable, partly thanks to the use of privileges for the docile and intimidation of the independent-minded. Another source of strength was tight control of language and information that deemed most criticism unpatriotic. Cracks came as information spread, especially about the system's bogus history and economic failings. Nationalism was a potent solvent too, particularly in places such as the Baltic states, that felt they were captive nations of a foreign empire.
A. ¾îÈÖ
the Communist block Íìß§òæç½(°ø»êÁø¿µ).
discredit ½Å¿ëÀ» ¶³¾î¶ß¸®´Ù, ¹ÏÁö ¾Ê°Ô ÇÏ´Ù. disastrous î¬úª(ÀçÇØ)ÀÇ, ÆÄ¸êÀûÀÎ.
ally µ¿¸Í±¹. deserved ...À» ¹ÞÀ» ¸¸ÇÑ ÀÚ°ÝÀÌ ÀÖ´Â. general À屺. regime ïÙÏí(Á¤±Ç).
Soviet forces áÌÖ¤ÏÚ(¼Ò·Ã±º). initially óÀ½¿¡´Â. liberator ú°Û¯íº(ÇØ¹æÀÚ).
a degree of ¾î´À Á¤µµÀÇ. consent µ¿ÀÇ, 黙ìã(¹¬ÀÎ). occupation ï¿ÖÅ(Á¡·É).
nirvana Áö»ó³«¿ø, æîÚé(¿¹Ý), ú°÷(ÇØÅ»). mass murder ´ë·®Çлì.
latterly ¸»±â¿¡´Â, ÃÖ±Ù¿¡. self-interested Þç××Þçé¯(»ç¸®»ç¿å)ÀÇ.
authoritarian µ¶ÀçÁÖÀÇÀÇ, ±ÇÀ§ÁÖÀÇÀÇ. bureaucrat °ü·á. remarkably ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ¸¸ÇϰÔ.
durable Áú±ä, Ò±ÎùÕô(³»±¸·Â)ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â. thanks to ...¶§¹®¿¡. privilege Ư±Ç.
the docile À¯¼øÇÑ(¼øÁ¾ÀûÀÎ) »ç¶÷µé. cf. the+Çü¿ë»ç¡æº¹¼öº¸Åë¸í»ç.
intimidation À§Çù, Çù¹Ú. deem »ý°¢ÇÏ´Ù, °£ÁÖÇÏ´Ù. criticism ºñÆÇ.
unpatriotic ÞªäñÏÐîÜ(ºñ¾Ö±¹Àû)ÀÎ. crack °Áø Æ´(±Ý). bogus °¡Â¥ÀÇ, À§Á¶ÀÇ.
nationalism ¹ÎÁ·ÁÖÀÇ. potent °·ÂÇÑ. solvent ÇØ°á»ç, éÁØÚ(¿ë¸Å).
the Baltic states ¹ßÆ® ð³ÏÐ(Á¦±¹). empire ð¨ÏÐ(Á¦±¹).
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 ÇØ¼öºÎ 'ºÎ»ê ÀÎÀç'´Â ¾î¶»°Ô ¹ß±¼ÇØ¾ß Çϳª
- 2 ÀÌÀç¸í ´ëÅë·ÉÀº ÀÚ½ÅÀ» À§Çؼ¶óµµ °ÅºÎ±ÇÀ» Çà»çÇØ¾ß!
- 3 À±¼®¿°ú ±è¿ëÇö, Dumb and Dumber
- 4 ÀÌÇýÈÆ »çÅ·Π°¡Àå ¿ì½À°Ô µÈ »ç¶÷Àº À嵿Çõ!
- 5 'ùÛÏÐ ÙãáÔìÑ æêîî'À» Àаí
- 6 û¿Í´ë¸¦ ¿Å±â¸é Á¤±ÇÀÌ ¸ÁÇÏ°í ¼öµµ¸¦ ¿Å±â¸é ³ª¶ó°¡ ¸ÁÇÑ´Ù!
- 7 ºÒ¹ý°ú °ÅÁþ¸» °ø°³¼±µ¿ ¹ý´ë±³¼ö¸¦ ÀÚ¸£Áö ¾Ê´Â ±¹¹Î´ëÇÐ
- 8 ºÏÇÑ ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ´«°ú ±Í¸¦ ¸·´Â »ç¶÷µé
- 9 ÀÌÀç¸í ´ëÅë·ÉÀÇ ÇØº´´ë µ¶¸³ ÃßÁøÀº ½ÅÁßÇØ¾ß
- 10 ¾ð·ÐÀÌ ºÐ ´ÜÀ§·Î º¸µµÇÏ´Â ´ÙÄ«ÀÌÄ¡ ÀϺ» ¼ö»óÀÇ ÇÏ·ç












