The Story of Man ¨è

It takes outrageous profit or provocation for someone to do down a relative with whom they share a lot of genes.
11-3-52
Modern Darwinism's big breakthrough was the identification of the central role of trust in human evolution. People who are related collaborate on the basis of nepotism. It takes outrageous profit or provocation for someone to do down a relative with whom they share a lot of genes. Trust, though, allows the unrelated to collaborate, by keeping score of who does what and when, and punishing cheats.
Very few animals can manage this. Indeed, outside the primates, only vampire bats have been shown to trust non-relatives routinely. (Well-fed bats will give some of the blood they have swallowed to hungry neighbours, but expect the favour to be returned when they are hungry and will deny favours to those who have cheated in the past.) The human mind, however, seems to have evolved the trick of being able to identify a large number of individuals and to keep score of its relations with them, detecting the dishonest or greedy and taking vengeance, even at some cost to itself. This process may even be--as Matt Ridley, who wrote for this newspaper a century and a half after Spencer, described it--the origin of virtue.

A. ¾îÈÖ
breakthrough ¹æÀ§¼±µ¹ÆÄ, ³­°üÀÇ Å¸°³, ºñ¾àÀû ¹ßÀü. identification È®ÀÎ.
the identification of the central role of trust in human evolution ÀηùÁøÈ­¿¡ À־ (Àΰ£»óÈ£°£ÀÇ) ½Å·ÚÀÇ Áß½ÉÀû ¿ªÇÒÀ» È®ÀÎÇÑ °Í.
nepotism ¿¬°íÀÚ ÔôéÄ(µî¿ë). outrageous µµ¸®¿¡ ¾î±ß³­, ±Ø¾ÇÇÑ.
provocation È­³ª°Ô Çϱâ, µµ¹ß. do down ¼ÓÀÌ´Ù, ¼Ó¿©¼­ À̵æÀ» º¸´Ù.
relative ģô. share Íìêó(°øÀ¯)ÇÏ´Ù. the unrelated ¿¬ÁÙ°ü°è°¡ ¾ø´Â »ç¶÷.
keep score of Á¡°ËÇÏ´Ù, ÃßÀûÇÏ´Ù.
by keeping score of who does what and when, and punishing cheats. ´©°¡ ¾ðÁ¦ ¹«¾ùÀ» ÇÏ´ÂÁö¸¦ Á¡°ËÇÏ°í ¼ÓÀÌ´Â ÀÚ¸¦ ó¹úÇÔÀ¸·Î½á. cf. does¡æcollaborate.
outside primates çÏíþ×¾(¿µÀå·ù)¿Ü¿¡´Â. vampire bats ÈíÇ÷¹ÚÁã.
non-relative ģôÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ÀÚ. routinely ÀÏ»óÀûÀ¸·Î. well-fed Àß ¸ÔÀº, ¿µ¾çÀÌ ÃæºÐÇÑ. swallow »ïŰ´Ù.
expect the favor to be returned º£Ç¬ ÀºÇý¸¦ µÇ °±¾Æ ¹Þ±â¸¦ ±â´ëÇÑ´Ù.
trick ÝúÛö(ºñ¹ý). relation ģô. detect °£ÆÄÇÏ´Ù.
the dishonest or greedy Á¤Á÷ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Å³ª Ž¿å½º·¯¿î ÀÚ. itself ¡æ the human mind
this newspaper¡æthe Economist. the origin of virtue ¹Ì´öÀÇ ±â¿ø.

B. ±¸¹®
-It takes outrageous profit. . . they share a lot of genes.
cf. it takes...ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.
[À¯ÀüÀÎÀÚ¸¦ °øÀ¯Çϴ ģôÀ» ¼ÓÀδٴ °ÍÀº µµ¸®¿¡ ±Ø¾ÇÇÑ ÀÌÀ±Ãëµæ ÇàÀ§ÀÌ°í µµ¹ß ÇàÀ§ÀÌ´Ù.(ģôÀ» ¼ÓÀÌ¸é ¿ë¼­¹Þ±â Èûµé´Ù).]
-The human mind, however, seems. . . at some cost to itself.
cf. to+have+pp. ¡æ¿Ï·áºÎÁ¤»ç: º»µ¿»ç º¸´Ù ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¦ ¾Õ¼±´Ù.
The human mind seems to have evolved. . .
¡æIt seems that the human mind has evolved. . .
ex. It seems that he was (has been) a school teacher.
¡æHe seems to have been a school teacher. (¿Ï·áºÎÁ¤»ç)
It seems that he is a school teacher.
¡æHe seems to be a school teacher. (´Ü¼øºÎÁ¤»ç):ºÎÁ¤»çÀÇ ½ÃÁ¦=º»µ¿»ç½ÃÁ¦)
[Àΰ£Àº ¸¹Àº °³Ã¼ÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¸¦ È®ÀÎÇϰí Á¤Á÷ÇÏÁö ¸øÇϰųª Ž¿å½º·¯¿î ÀÚµéÀ» ŽÁöÇØ¼­ ´Ù¼ÒÀÇ Èñ»ýÀ» °¨¼öÇÏ°í¼­¶óµµ ±×µé¿¡°Ô º¸º¹ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±â¼úÀ» ÁøÈ­½ÃÄѿԴø °Íó·³ º¸ÀδÙ.]

11-4-53
The new social Darwinists (those who see society itself, rather than savannah or the jungle, as the 'natural' environment in which humanity is evolving and to which natural selection responds) have not abandoned Spencer altogether, of course. But they have put a new spin on him. The ranking by way of which Spencer so approved is but one example of a wider tendency for people to try to out-do each other. And that competition, whether athletic, artistic or financial, does seem to be about genetic display. Unfakeable demonstrations of superiority that has at least some underlying genetic component are almost unfailingly attractive to the opposite sex. Thus both of the things needed to make an economy work, collaboration and competition, seem to have evolved under Charles Darwin's penetrating gaze.

Dystopia and Utopia
This is a view full of ironies, of course. One is that its reconciliation of competition and collaboration bears a remarkable similarity to the sort of Hegelian synthesis beloved of Marxists. Perhaps a bigger one, though, is that the Earth's most capitalist country, America, is the only place in the rich world that contains a significant group of dissenters from any sort of evolutionary explanation of human behaviour at all. But it is also, in its way, a comforting view. It suggests a constant struggle, not for existence itself, but between selfishness and altruism--a struggle that neither can win. Utopia may be impossible, but Dystopia is unstable, too, as the collapse of Marxism showed. Human nature is not, to use another of Spencer's favorite phrases (though one borrowed from Tennyson, his poetical contemporary), red in tooth and claw, and societies built around the idea that it is are doomed to early failure.

A. ¾îÈÖ
natural selection í»æÔÔ£÷À(ÀÚ¿¬µµÅÂ). abandon ´Ü³äÇÏ´Ù.
put a new spin on him ±×¿¡°Ô »õ·Î¿î Èû(ȸÀü·Â)À» ÁÖ´Ù. ranking µî±Þ ¸Å±â±â. ¼øÀ§.
approve ½ÂÀÎÇÏ´Ù. out-do ´É°¡ÇÏ´Ù. competition °æÀï. genetic display À¯ÀüÀû °ú½Ã.
unfakeable ¼û±æ ¼ö ¾ø´Â, Ù¼ðã(¸ðÁ¶)ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â. superiority éÐêÆ(¿ì¿ù), ¿ìÀ§.
unfakeable demonstrations of superiority ¿ì¿ù¼ºÀÇ È®½ÇÇÑ °ú½Ã. component ¼ººÐ.
some underlying genetic component ¾î¶² ±Ùº»ÀûÀÎ À¯Àü ¼ººÐ.
the opposite sex »ó´ë¹æ(³²¼º/¿©¼º). penetrating ¿¹¸®ÇÑ, °üÅëÇÏ´Â, ÅëÂû·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Â.
dystopia °áÇÔ»çȸ, »ì±â ¾î·Á¿î °÷. reconciliation È­ÇØ.
bears a remarkable similarity ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ ëºÞÄàõ(À¯»ç¼º)À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù.
synthesis beloved of Marxists ¸·½ºÁÖÀÇÀÚµéÀÌ »ç¶ûÇÏ´Â Á¾ÇÕ. cf. beloved of(by) ...¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »ç¶û ¹Þ´Ù.
significant Áß¿äÇÑ. dissenter ¹Ý´ëÀÚ.
dissenters from any sort of evolutionary explanation of human behaviour at all
Àΰ£Çൿ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾î¶² Á¾·ùÀÇ ÁøÈ­·ÐÀû ¼³¸í¿¡µµ ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î ¹Ý´ëÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷µé.
cf. ¸í»çÈ­ ±¸¹®¡æ¹®ÀåÀ» ¸í»ç±¸·Î º¯Çü.
ex. He explains human behaviour¡æHis explanation of human behaviour.
constant struggle ²÷ÀÓ¾ø´Â ÅõÀï. altruism ì¦öâñ«ëù(ÀÌŸÁÖÀÇ). collapse ÝÚÎÕ(ºØ±«).
contemporary ÔÒãÁÓÛìÑ(µ¿½Ã´ëÀÎ). claw (Áü½ÂÀÇ) °¥°í¸® ¹ßÅé. doom ¿î¸íÁþ´Ù.

B. ±¸¹®
-The ranking by way of which. . . for people to try to out-do each other.
[Spencer Å©°Ô ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´ø µî±Þ ¸Å±â±â´Â Àΰ£ÀÌ Å¸ÀÎÀ» ´É°¡ÇÏ·Á´Â º¸´Ù Å« °æÇâÀÇ ÇÑ °¡Áö ¿¹¿¡ ºÒ°úÇÏ´Ù.]
-Thus both of the things needed . . .doomed to early failure.
cf. both of the things¡æcollaboration and competition
[±×·¡¼­ °æÁ¦°¡ ÀÛµ¿Çϵµ·Ï Çϱâ À§Çؼ­ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ µÎ °¡Áö »ç¹°, Áï Çùµ¿°ú °æÀïÀº ´ÙÀ©ÀÇ ¿¹¸®ÇÑ ñ¼ãÊ(ÁÖ½Ã)ÇÏ¿¡(´ÙÀ©ÀÇ ÁøÈ­·Ð ¿øÄ¢¿¡ µû¶ó¼­) ÁøÈ­ÇØ ¿Ô´ø °Íó·³ º¸ÀδÙ.]
-Human nature is not, to use another . . . doomed to early failure.
cf. to use¡æif we use.
the idea that it is¡æthe idea that human nature is red in tooth and claw.
[Spencer°¡ ¾ÖÈ£ÇÏ´Â ¾î±¸ Áß¿¡¼­ ¶Ç Çϳª¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏÀÚ¸é(ÀÌ ¸»Àº ºñ·Ï ±×¿Í µ¿½Ã´ëÀÇ ½ÃÀÎÀ̾ú´ø TennysonÀÇ ½Ã¿¡¼­ ºô·Á¿Â °ÍÀÌÁö¸¸), Àΰ£ÀÇ º»¼ºÀº (Çdzª´Â °æÀï ¶§¹®¿¡) ÀÌ»¡°ú ¹ßÅéÀÌ Çǰ¡ ¹¯¾î¼­ ºÓÁö´Â ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç Àΰ£ÀÇ º»¼ºÀÌ ÇÇ·Î ¹°µé¾î ÀÖ´Ù´Â »ç»ó¿¡ µû¶ó °Ç¼³µÈ »çȸ´Â »¡¸® ¸ÁÇÒ ¿î¸í¿¡ óÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù.]

11-5-54
Of the three great secular faiths born in the 19th century--Darwinism, Marxism and Freudianism-- the second died swiftly and painfully and the third is slipping peacefully away. But Darwinism goes from strength to strength. If its ideas are right, the handful of dust that evolution has shaped into humanity will rarely stray too far off course. And that is, perhaps, a hopeful thought to carry into the New Year.

A. ¾îÈÖ
secular ¼¼¼ÓÀÇ, ºñÁ¾±³ÀûÀÎ. faith ½Å¾Ó, ½ÅÁ¶, ±³¸®, Ãæ¼º. swiftly ½Å¼ÓÇϰÔ.
slip away »ç¶óÁö´Ù. goes from strength to strength Á¡Á¡ ´õ °­ÇØÁö´Ù.
the handful of dust that evolution has shaped into humanity ÁøÈ­°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Àηù ¼Ó¿¡ Çü¼ºµÈ ÇÑÁÜÀÇ ¸ÕÁö(¹Ù¶÷ÁöÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ °Í). stray Á¤µµ¸¦ ¹þ¾î³ª´Ù, ±æÀ» ÀÒ´Ù.
will rarely stray too far off course ÁøÈ­ÀÇ ÄÚ½º¿¡¼­ ³Ê¹« ¸Ö¸® ¹þ¾î³ªÁö´Â ¾ÊÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
  • Æ®À§ÅÍ
  • ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
  • ¡èÀ§·Î
Copyright ¨Ï Á¶°©Á¦´åÄÄ - ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷ ±ÝÁö
´ñ±Û´Þ±â ´ñ±Û¾²±â ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×

´ñ±Û´Þ±â´Â ·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ëÀº 100ÀÚ À̳»·Î Àû¾îÁֽʽÿÀ. ±¤°í, ¿å¼³, ºñ¼Ó¾î, ÀνŰø°Ý°ú ÇØ´ç ±Û°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â ±ÛÀº »çÀüÅ뺸¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µË´Ï´Ù.

¿Ö´õÄ«¸£ÅÚÀ»Àú°ÝÇÑ´Ù
ÀÇ·É ¿ì¹ü°ï ¼ø°æ ÃѱⳭ»ç »ç°Ç
¹Ú½Â¿ëÀÇ FREEDOM ±³¾ç ¿µ¾î
¾ö»óÀÍ º¯È£»çÀÇ ¸ø´ÙÇÑ À̾߱â
UFO¿Í ȯ»ýÀ̾߱â
±è¿µÀÇ åëÖåºñÆÇ
 »ï¼º¹è³Ê

PC ¹öÀü